In praise of Jeremy Clarkson
It’s fair to say that Jeremy Clarkson
divides opinion like few other television presenters do. You either love him or loathe him: there are
no half measures.
Personally, I think he’s an absolute
gem. I relate to him and his views,
possibly because I too am a middle aged, over-weight man with a liking for Levi’s. I even had greying hair like him, until it
started thinning drastically and I shaved it off.
He is an opinionated old git, and his views
are often controversial, but that’s probably for viewer consumption only. If you knew him personally he’s probably
completely different and a nice bloke.
But his TV persona undoubtedly made (and continues to make) Top Gear the runaway success it is. It remains the most popular BBC production,
continues to be sold in countries all over the world, dubbed into various
languages including Farsi (remarkably it’s the most popular show on Iranian
television) and has spawned copycat shows in, amongst other countries, the USA and Australia (seen them both and they
are nowhere near as good – although the local rednecks and convicts probably
love ‘em). And it’s all down to Jezza.
I’ve enjoyed the program for years, even
back in the old days when it was presented by Quentin Willson or Vicki Butler
Henderson or some mad Northern Irish bloke whose name I’ve forgotten. It was a worthy but dull show, featuring
serious and useful reviews of various cars, mainly family saloons rather than
supercars or muscle cars or hot hatches (God, I’m not even sure those terms had
been invented….shows my age). Most weeks the highlight was racing driver
Tiff Needell – a kind of 1980s Stig – power-sliding a Cortina or something
perfectly to end up stationary and side-on to the camera as he delivered the
final line of his review.
Then along came Clarkson. Initially as a contributor, one of the team. He was already a motoring journalist and
newspaper columnist, and his segments were always more pithy and entertaining
and downright anarchic than anyone else’s, and very soon he was the most
popular guy in the show, and took over from Quentin et al. In came May, and Hammond, and a new producer,
and the show moved from being a worthy but dull motoring program to
Entertainment. And there it has remained
ever since. It has made all three
presenters rich and public figures, but Clarkson is by far and away the best
rewarded. Because as well as being
anarchic and opinionated and sometimes downright rude, he is also a very clever
man.
You see, he has a deal that as well as
paying him an attractive salary for presenting the show, also provides for
repeat fees (nationally and internationally) and a share of merchandising. Now as the program is aired every day in Poland
for instance (and on some days there is more than one broadcast) this clearly
mounts up to a tidy sum. DVD sales? Check – a cut of that, and they are popular
sellers (even if largely off-cuts and compilations from the tv show). Top
Gear magazine? Yep – and he writes a
monthly column too. The American and
Australian versions contribute to his bank balance as well, through the
licencing agreement. His contract is
basically a licence to print money. He
earns far more than May and Hammond because they do not have the same level of
royalties and repeat fees, even though to my way of thinking they are as
integral to the show’s success as Jezza – it wouldn’t be the same without
either of them.
And now he’s a best-selling author too. This is where his true genius shows itself.
I’ve read most of the books he’s published,
and thoroughly enjoyed them all. They
are even more irreverent than the tv shows. He is ruder about certain types of car and certain
groups of people (especially Germans, Americans and environmentalists) than he
can get away with on the telly. They
even talk a lot of sense at times. All
written in the same short sentences and vivid turns of phrase that he employs
in his best tv segments.
But the real genius is that only one of
those books is an “original” – “I know
you got soul”, which is an entertaining read that takes various disparate
things – for instance the Spitfire, a Kalashnikov rifle, the B52 bomber – and while
relating their history in an often hilarious, typically Clarkson fashion,
explains why they transcend normality and become special. All the rest are compilations of his various
newspaper and magazine columns. For
which, of course, he’s already been well paid once, and he is now being lucratively
rewarded for again.
I’ve just bought The Top Gear Years. The
blurb on the cover made it sound like an inside story of how the program came
to be the tv juggernaut it undoubtedly is, written by the man who knows it all
best, Clarkson himself. Nope. It turns out to be another compilation, this
time from his Top Gear magazine
column.
Do I feel cheated? Not at all, because it’s still a very funny
and entertaining read.
I wish I could stumble on such a money
making scheme though….
Clarkson, I salute you.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home