Election week - hurrah! China and the US go the polls.
I wrote on here last year sometime that in the previous 12
months I’d been in three countries – Lebanon, Trinidad and Britain – where
sitting governments were kicked out in favour of coalition governments. They’re all still hanging in there – no
surprise in Lebanon, where coalition is a way of life and always has been, but
Trinidad seems to be doing ok too. As
for Britain…..well, it seems to me that Cameron’s government is only hanging on
for two reasons: first, the lack of a credible alternative, as the Labour party
continues to struggle with the search for an identity (such a shame that after
all the early promise of Blair’s New Labour it all soured under Brown and has
left them totally useless). Second, and
more importantly, the first thing Cameron did after taking power was introduce
legislation that essentially removed from Parliament the Vote of No Confidence,
and guaranteed a full 5 year term in office – no matter how incompetent and
unpopular the coalition turned out to be.
And they are certainly that – from the outside looking in, this ConLib
coalition seems confused over policy, unsure of anything except staying out of
the Euro at all costs, and specialises in government by SoundBite……. Should the Vote of No Confidence still be
there, I have no doubt they would be kicked out at the earliest opportunity,
and it seems grossly undemocratic (and hypocritical) of Cameron to deny the
British people the opportunity. So
Britons will have to wait another couple of years to make their feelings known
at the ballot box.
Shame.
There is no chance of a coalition in either country that has
an election this week, of course.
In China, there is the “election” (if you can call it that)
of the new governing Politburo. But
since they are all members of the Communist Party and the decisions were taken
weeks ago and are only being rubber stamped by the Party Congress in its once a
decade beano, it’s all a foregone conclusion.
The major interest will follow over the next weeks and months as the new
boys get to grips with running the second biggest (or is it the biggest now?)
economy in the world. This latest
government has undoubtedly made monumental strides in bringing China forward,
moving from a peasant and agricultural economy to an industrial and financial powerhouse. The challenge for the new boys will be to
maintain that progress, and maybe even move to a more democratic society. Not that I will hold my breath over that
happening anytime soon. They also need
to get to grips with the corruption that seems endemic in China (as in Russia,
Ukraine, Byelorus…..see the common theme there?) and the continuing authoritarian
rule that blocks freedom of speech, Google and Facebook (amongst others) for
the merest critical comment. I’m not
holding breath over that one, either. It
will take a whole new generation to come through for that to happen – so probably
not in my lifetime then.
There will be no coalition in the US either. While China is a one-party state, the US has
two, and there is never any credible opposition or alternative to either. Now and again someone will stand as an
Independent, and proceed to get hammered at the ballot box and lose a fortune
without making any difference at all – this is democracy, American style, where
votes and elections are won by bank balance as much as policy. This year, between them, the two parties have
raised and spent half a billion dollars to try and get elected. Much of the money has been spent in
advertising, a lot of it virulent and nasty, as each party tries to paint his
opponent in the worst possible light.
And much of the advertising has been, shall we say, less than honest. Another heap of cash has been spent ferrying
candidates from state to state, electioneering at town hall meetings and making
speeches to carefully vetted invitation only audiences – and of course the
world’s media. Against a machine like
that, what chance has any independent or minority party (for instance the
Greens) of making any kind of impact come election time? None – they hardly have any nuisance value,
let alone a relevant voice.
But no matter how bad the situation, there is no prospect of
the Democrats and Republicans sharing responsibility or decision making in the
way a European style coalition ever would.
It’s just not in their political DNA.
For the past four years, Obama has been struggling with a global recession
and a discredited banking system, not to mention two expensive conflicts
thousands of miles away in Afghanistan and Iraq, all bequeathed to him by good
ol’ Republican George Bush. The
recession gave him unprecedented unemployment numbers, and industries, notably
the auto industry, that were all but deceased from their extreme uncompetetiveness. He has tried to make a difference and do
something about it, and at every step a Republican-dominated Senate has blocked
him. To his credit, he managed to force
through bills to provide billions of dollars of state aid to save the car
industry (and with it millions of jobs).
He forced through his “Obamacare” health reforms, decried by Republicans
as an expense too much, despite providing guaranteed health care to millions
who previously had been unable to afford any kind of treatment. US troops have largely been brought home from
Iraq and a timetable is in place to do likewise from Afghanistan by the end of
2014. He even managed to do something
Bush, for all his gung-ho rhetoric, had failed to do and take out Osama bin
Laden. There has been a huge cost, of
course, to all this and the national debt is running at record levels.
I think, given what he’s been up against, he’s done a pretty
good job. Things are turning round, the
economy seems to be slowly recovering, with jobless numbers going down month by
month. If the rest of the world –
notably Europe, that is in a dreadful state – could manage to drag itself out
of its own recession, he’d be in a much better position, and his re-election
guaranteed. Even with all the problems
still to be faced and debt to be paid off, he seems to me to deserve a second
term, to finish the work he’s started. Mitt Romney, his Republican opponent in
tomorrow’s Election, seems to have spent much of his campaign calling Obama
incompetent and worse, and offers the alternative of lower taxes and smaller
government as a way forward. He cites
his success running private equity firm Bain & Co before moving into
politics – despite Bain being a leading player in the very casino banking that
is now universally (if somewhat unfairly) vilified as the root cause the world’s
financial crisis. Hardly a ringing recommendation, I would have
thought. He has also pledged that the
first piece of legislation he will sign, on his first day in office, will be to
repeal Obamacare in its entirety, thus throwing those millions of beneficiaries
back onto the medical scrapheap. That
promise alone should set alarm bells ringing nationwide and disqualify the
bloke from office.
But no. With voting
tomorrow, the Presidential race is neck and neck – too close to call. Obama 49%, Romney 48%. Or 48%
and 50%. Or 49% to 49%......it all
depends on which poll you look at. So
here we are today, with the pair of them flying across country, last minute speechifying
to try and persuade the few undecided voters to go their way. Obama has surged a little over the past
week, as he has been perceived to manage the aftermath of Superstorm Sandy very
well. Will it be enough?
Personally, I hope so.
The guy seems more genuine than Romney by a mile, and the policies he’s
followed and implemented so far have clearly been aimed at the less well-off and
improving the lives of all Americans, not merely the wealthy. I remember at his first election, to counter
his politics of Hope (“Yes, we can!” – remember that?) there were all kinds of
scare stories circulating about his being a closet Muslim and dangerous, but of
course they all proved to be so much hot air.
This time around, despite Romney being a Mormon, religion has proved to
be a non-runner as a concern to the electorate…..and to me, this is how it
should be: an individual’s religious beliefs should not disqualify him from
holding office if all other factors show him to be the best qualified. The same goes for colour, gender and sexual
orientation – I can’t wait to see the first native American lesbian elected to
the White House.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home