I’ve been writing things, on and off, for most of my
life. It’s something I enjoy doing, and
without blowing my own trumpet I thinks it’s something I do quite well. This blog is just the latest manifestation of
something that, while not really an obsession, is very important to me. In all that time I’ve only had one item
published (if you disregard Around the
World…., which essentially I’m self-publishing courtesy the Mighty
WWW). It was a short story I entered
into a competition run by the Surrey Mirror newspaper, way back in the mid-60s
for its festive issue. It was called
something like “Hitch-hiking Home for
Christmas” and was I think 500 words long, and described how I (first
person narrative, of course) thumbed various rides home from a logging camp in
British Columbia to spend Christmas with my family in Kent….. I was about 11 or 12 I think, and won a
postal order for thirty bob (that’s £1-50 in new money) for my trouble. My mum and dad were immensely proud, and told
anyone who would listen that one day I would earn my living from my pen.
It gave me a bit of a spur, I suppose, and throughout my
school days I fiddled about with my exercise book and mandatory Osmiroid
fountain pen. I know I started and never
finished dozens of now forgotten stories, but did fill one book, when I was
maybe 15, with poetry. One I remember to
this day, inspired by Erich von Daniken’s then best seller “Chariots of the Gods?” (postulating that ancient Mayan and
Egyptian civilizations were kick-started by visiting aliens) and a book by
someone else, I forget who, that suggested that Christianity – and religious
belief in general - was a direct result of early hallucinogenic experimentation,
went:
Was God an Astronaut? Von Daniken said,
He must be crazy
in the head!
Everyone knows
the one to whom
He refers is but
a Sacred Mushroom.
Ah, adolescence! I
thought I had lost the book at school but it turned up 20 years later, after my
mum died (she seems to have hoarded it somewhere in her stuff, God bless her)
so I took it home, but alas I’ve managed to lose it again somewhere along the
way. Ah, well, c’est la vie.
Later on, when I left school, I had less time to write, as I
was working for a living or else playing football or cricket, or getting
drunk……all the usual teenage stuff. I
was also devouring sci-fi by the crate load – Clarke, Heinlein, Asimov,
Andersen – all the Golden Age legends, and newer writers then like Larry Niven
and Piers Anthony. So naturally enough,
when I hit my twenties and got my second wind so to speak I started writing
sci-fi too. It’s all lost now, perhaps
fortunately: a lot of it was excruciatingly bad and derivative and eminently
forgettable, but I can still remember the odd yarn. There was a fairly short one about the return
to Earth of the first starship several thousand years after it had started its
journey, during which the crew had only aged about 10 years (relatively
speaking….), and finding a world that had gone through an ecological disaster
that had seen the seas all but disappear and all life too. They landed in a long dry valley between the
Australian Gold Coast and the Great Barrier Reef, I remember plotting, and
failing to recognise where it actually was.
I think they killed themselves in despair. Then there was another one, very derivative of
Isaac Asimov, about a bloke who invented a time machine but something went
wrong and he ended up being projected back about 5 minutes every time he tried
it out, and just repeating the same thing over and over again (“a tape loop in
time”, I described it…..almost poetic, that).
There was also a series of three or four stories about a
bloke called Jay Soon – very Larry Niven-ish, they were, and all basically
extended puns. In one our hero went
hunting for a huge yellow insect (it was called Jay Soon and the Golden Fleas), another where he goes out and
collects the Voyager 1 space probe to sell to a tv company to use as an advert,
and a third where he goes to some planet or other to toboggan down an eighty
mile high mountain but finds someone else has already done it (here the pun was
again in a character’s name)…… I still
have them somewhere at home. They’re not
bad, when I think about how pissed I usually was when I wrote them, and what
turmoil my life was in. This was the
early to mid-1970’s, a fun decade.
Then I stopped again, because I got married and had kids,
and had far too many important things to do than waste my time scribbling in
exercise books. I was trying (not
altogether successfully) to nurture a career too. I was working in a succession of banks, in
pretty much pre-computerized (or at best limited main-frame, punch-card, pre-PC
days) offices where a lot of work was manual and involved not quite quill pens
and ledgers but not far short. So I was
indeed earning my living through my pen (a ball Pentel or Biro this time,
fountain pens are such old hat….), just not in the way mum and dad had meant,
nor indeed how I wanted to (deep down). But my first priority was paying the mortgage
and buying clothes and food, and booking school trips and all those things –
things I could only do working, and with no obvious way of making any dosh
writing I let it go. To be honest, I
lacked inspiration too – I still read copiously, all kinds of stuff (my tastes
remain eclectic and wide ranging to this day: I always have at least one book
on the go and often more), but I could never get an idea clear enough in my
mind to get anywhere. I guess all the
influences I was soaking up in my subconscious confused me.
I did try though. I
started one semi-autobiographical, hopefully funny book about four guys going
on a bachelor vacation in Majorca (as I and some mates had done back in the
early 70s). I called it One Peseta, Two Peseta…., with the vague
idea of a follow up set in Benidorm called Three
Peseta, Four…., but abandoned it after about page 10. I’ll never go back to that one, the euro has
basically killed the terrible titular pun.
Then I lost my job so I had more time. I even bought a pretty crappy electronic
typewriter and bashed out a story, much more adult, that I even finished. It was called The Road to Zennor, and featured a bond trader who takes a long
weekend at his holiday home in Cornwall, has a brief (and highly descriptive)
fling with a girl hitchhiker he picks up on Bodmin Moor who turns out to be the
ghost of a missing heiress. Bit of weird
one, but I still have it somewhere at home, and I like it. I showed it to someone who worked then at a
women’s magazine, and she thought it was sellable, but I never got around to
doing anything about it. And finally, I
wrote my book, in a constant six week graft during a very very quiet spell at
work when I basically had nothing else to do.
It fills two exercise books, runs to maybe 200 pages and is about sex
and booze and football (as opposed to sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll) –
subjects dear to my heart. That was in
about 1985. Since then, I’ve had about
four stabs at re-drafting it into a proper manuscript but never finished it –
work always seems to get in the way. The
latest effort is nestling within the bowels of this ThinkPad’s files, 70%
completed. But I forgot to pack the bloody original to finish it while I’m here
in Hamilton. I could kick myself!
One day, I will finish it and I will publish it – on my own
if I have to.
But all that is preamble.
What my mum and dad envisaged, fifty years ago now, was not
my being an author, a writer churning out fiction for the masses, but being a
journalist. Whether they were thinking
local rag or national broadsheet was never clear, and the problem was neither
they nor I had the faintest idea how to go about it. My careers officer at school was, typically,
no use whatsoever. This is the man who
advised me not to bother trying to get into university because my parents would
never be able to affords the fees and in any case council estate children
didn’t go to uni. (Both points were
probably true then, in the late 60s, but hardly aspirational and frankly a
dereliction of his duty……careers office my arse.) So I kind of drifted into consultancy via the
London Stock Exchange and investment (sorry, casino) banking over the next
forty odd years.
But I often wonder, to this day, whether journalism might
not have been a better career choice, and indeed what my life would have been
like now had I taken that path.
Conjecture of course, no way of knowing.
I think I would probably have enjoyed myself – at least I could have
spent my time doing something I still enjoy – bashing away at a keyboard or
scrawling almost illegibly into a notebook, creating sentences and visions and
stories for other people’s enjoyment (I hope….). I’m sure I would have had my fair share of boredom
too, sitting around in courtrooms or pubs or wherever, waiting for something
interesting to happen that’s worth writing about, or collecting statistics from
hospitals of new arrivals and recent departures to fill the Births, Deaths and
Marriages column (or as my dad memorably called it the Hatched Matched and
Dispatched Page) in some local rag.
Would I ever have made an investigative journalist? A features editor or columnist? Better yet, a
sports (preferably football) reporter or music journalist? As I say, complete conjecture – but I think I
probably would, and a good one too, if only I’d had a shove in the right
direction at 16 or 17 when I gave my education up as a bad job and entered the
big wide increasingly ugly world of the wage earner.
I’m perhaps using rose tinted spectacles here. Not about the process of creating, being a
wordsmith, but being a journalist.
Because, from what I’ve read in a couple of news stories over the past
couple of days it seems to be an increasingly grubby and dangerous profession
these days.
First, there is the long awaited conclusion to the News of
the World phone hacking trial. The
story has been rumbling along for a few years, and the trial itself nearly nine
months but the verdicts finally came out today.
Basically, the editors and senior journalists at the paper spent a lot
of time and money hacking the mobile phones of literally hundreds of people –
celebrities, politicians, and ordinary people including (unforgivably) that of
a murdered teenage girl – to get a better (for which read more scurrilous)
story for a paper that had once been well respected but had turned into a bit
of a kiss-and-tell rag. Complaints were
made, police investigations and public
enquiries set up and a new press code of conduct and self-governance proposed
(but so far not implemented). The paper
itself was closed down after nearly 150 years of publishing. Today, the ex-editor was found guilty on a
number of charges and faces jail time.
Four other accused, who pleaded guilty, are also looking at spending
time at Her Majesty’s Pleasure. Another
four were today acquitted of all charges but face uncertain futures after their
names and journalistic reputations have been dragged through the mud.
What makes it worse is that Andy Coulson, the editor found
guilty today, after leaving the paper was appointed top spin doctor to the
Conservative Party – personally interviewed and hired by current Prime Minister
David Cameron and Chancellor George Osborne.
They swear they asked him in the interviews if the phone hacking
allegations were true and appear to have accepted the “What me, guv? Nah,
wouldn’t do a fing like that, guv” answer as gospel without further checking,
and hired the bloke to a position giving him access to God know’s how much
sensitive material. Cameron has done the
relatively decent thing of apologizing unreservedly for his “honest mistake” in
making a decision he “now knows to be wrong” – but is that enough? Osborne has been curiously silent about his
part in the affair, which surprises me not at all – the man’s a weasel. Typically the Opposition have started
pillorying Cameron for a lack of judgement (not for the first time) and
demanding his resignation (also not for the first time, nor probably the last).
This follows a couple of days after a story from Poland
wherein the offices of a news magazine were raided after publication of a story
that involves a further case of phone hacking, this time those of various
Polish ministers, one of whom was taped having a conversation with the head of
the (supposedly impartial and independent) central bank about what would be the
best policies to follow to help the government win the forthcoming general
elections. The situation is boiling away
there and could lead to snap elections that could quite possibly end up with
the ruling PO being punished at the ballot box and kicked out of office.
The interesting part of this little story, splashed across
the Guardian but seemingly ignored elsewhere, is a series of conversations
between the Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski (an Oxford colleague of messrs
Cameron and Osborne and London Mayor Boris Johnson) in which he roundly and
obscenely accuses Cameron in particular and the UK government in general of
being complete idiots in regard to EU relationships and “fucking up” big time
and being completely out of tune with what the rest of the EU wants and so on
and so on. Nothing new there, perhaps, but a revealing glimpse of what other
nations think of Call Me Dave and his merry band of political lightweights
currently running Britain to rack and ruin.
These stories seem to me to shine a clear light on the way
today’s press use all kinds of dirty tricks to get the juiciest, most
unpleasant information to then splash across the front pages. It does not seem to matter who the story is
about – the more dirt the better. The
more a reputation is tarnished the better (and who cares whether the
accusations are true and attacks deserved).
Dirt sell papers. I seriously
cannot remember the last time I read a
genuine feel-good story in praise of something or somebody – there is always,
but always, a sting in even the nicest piece.
I’m not suggesting for one minute that politicians and paedophile tv
stars and serial killers and dishonest thieving bank executives should not be
pursued and brought to justice, of course not.
And I accept too that the press have a huge and often honourable part to
play in doing so. But surely there are
limits to public decency and, if you like, fair play that should never be
exceeded, and it seems to me the press these days – and not only in the UK but
in the US and Germany and Poland and elsewhere – are too keen to exceed those
limits.
And then you have the other side of the coin – the plight of
journalists imprisoned across the world for doing their job in an honest and
honourable way, reporting the facts and exposing what needs to be exposed –
telling it like it is, as our transatlantic cousins might put it. Putin’s Russia and China, in particular, have
large numbers of journalists locked up for simply not toeing the party line,
for saying things that the government would rather remain unsaid.
Yesterday, at a court hearing in Cairo, harsh prison terms
were confirmed on a trio of Al Jazeera journalists for, amongst other charges,
allegedly supporting a terrorist organization (the Muslim Brotherhood). When they were arrested in December last year
the Brotherhood was actually ruling the country (but shortly to be overthrown
in a military coup). The journalists and
Al Jazeera have consistently insisted that the men, who include an award
winning Australian and ex-BBC journalist Peter Greste, have no links with any
terrorist organization and were merely reporting what was happening on the
streets of Cairo and Alexandria and elsewhere, but the judicial system has
ignored that and locked them up for seven years. They intend to appeal, of course, but that
process in itself could take months – maybe a couple of years – to be
completed, given the state of the Egyptian legal system and chaotic state of
the country itself.
Now I watch Al Jazeera News quite lot, the English version
for which Greste worked, and it’s a good station. It seems to me less slanted than similar
networks (for instance CNN International has a huge American bias both in the
range of its presenters and in what it considers to be newsworthy, DW-TV has a
heavy German slant, France-24 English very French and so on), and covers
stories and features that are ignored elsewhere. I watched their coverage of the situation in
Egypt at the end of last year, right up to the day Greste and his colleagues
were arrested, as well as the CNN and BBC World coverage, and Al Jazeera were
as impartial as anyone else – nothing was said that, in my view, could be
considered pro-terrorist or pro-Muslim Brotherhood in any way.
And yet these men now face years in a jail far worse than
any that Coulson and his colleagues are ever likely to face in Britain. And for what?
For doing their job in an honest and honourable way. As opposed to a grubby, underhanded and
illegal way.
Which is the true face of journalism?